youwen5/alexandria
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

update draft

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Youwen Wu 2024-10-19 00:00:26 -07:00
parent fe9c362afe
commit 1600a90335
Signed by: youwen5
GPG key ID: 865658ED1FE61EC3
2 changed files with 10 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

BIN
work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.pdf
View file

Binary file not shown.

17
work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.typ
View file

@ -156,11 +156,11 @@ example of Zeus. Zeus will only reward those who believe in him specifically
with an eternal afterlife. So, if you believe in the wrong god, you don't go to with an eternal afterlife. So, if you believe in the wrong god, you don't go to
the afterlife. The author concludes believing in either Zeus or the Christian the afterlife. The author concludes believing in either Zeus or the Christian
God still result in expected utilities of $infinity$, while being an atheist God still result in expected utilities of $infinity$, while being an atheist
always has a finite expected utility. Therefore, you should still believe in always has a finite expected utility. Therefore, you should always believe in
_some_ god that could grant you an eternal afterlife, although no argument is _some_ god that could grant you an eternal afterlife, although no argument is
made for _which_ god. made for _which_ god.
However, this leaves out the possibility of gods who instead punish you for However, this leaves out the possibility of a god who instead punishes you for
eternity. For instance, suppose there exists an _Evil God_ who sends any theist eternity. For instance, suppose there exists an _Evil God_ who sends any theist
to hell for eternity, and does nothing to atheists. That is, the Evil God will to hell for eternity, and does nothing to atheists. That is, the Evil God will
punish anyone who believes in _any_ god, including those who believe in the punish anyone who believes in _any_ god, including those who believe in the
@ -214,11 +214,14 @@ usual method. We have $0.333 times infinity + 0.333 times 1 + 0.333 times
infinity is not a number in the traditional sense. It makes no sense to add or infinity is not a number in the traditional sense. It makes no sense to add or
subtract infinite values. For instance, try and subtract the total amount of subtract infinite values. For instance, try and subtract the total amount of
integers ($infinity$) from the total amount of real numbers (also $infinity$) integers ($infinity$) from the total amount of real numbers (also $infinity$)
#footnote[Famously, this infinity is "larger" than the infinite number of #footnote[Famously, the infinity of $RR$ is "larger" than the infinity of $ZZ$
integers in the sense of cardinality (G. Cantor). But subtracting them still in the sense of cardinality, where $frak(c) > aleph_0$ (G. Cantor). However,
makes no mathematical or physical sense.]. Clearly, this notion is meaningless our familiar algebraic operations of $+$ and $-$ are still not defined on them.
and we cannot obtain a solution. So, we consider $infinity - infinity$ an Perhaps we could pursue a line of reasoning to rigorously define algebra with
_indeterminate form_. So, the expected utility is now _undefined_. infinity using the hyperreals $attach(RR, tl: *)$, but that is out of the scope
of this paper.]. Clearly, this notion is meaningless and we cannot obtain a
solution. So, we consider $infinity - infinity$ an _indeterminate form_. So,
the expected utility is now _undefined_.
Consider the following Indeterminate Utilities argument: Consider the following Indeterminate Utilities argument: