diff --git a/work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.pdf b/work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.pdf
index dd15982..cfd9856 100644
Binary files a/work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.pdf and b/work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.pdf differ
diff --git a/work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.typ b/work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.typ
index 2094755..3f209ad 100644
--- a/work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.typ
+++ b/work/2024/phil-1/paper-1/main.typ
@@ -247,9 +247,10 @@ contradiction with BG2. So, if IU5 holds, then BG2 must fail.
 It's important to note that the Indeterminate Utilities argument doesn't say
 that the _opposite_ of BG2 is true. It doesn't argue that the expected utility
 of being an atheist is greater. In fact, it doesn't say anything about the
-expected utilities, except that they cannot all be compared. If they cannot all
-be calculated, then they cannot be compared. So, we can't say whether believing
-in god has a greater expected utility or not.
+expected utilities, except that they cannot be compared. If they can't be
+compared, then we can't say for certain which option has the higher expected
+utility. Since BG2 claims that believing in god must have the higher expected
+utility, it is a false premise.
 
 = Addressing Objections