auto-update(nvim): 2025-01-07 17:58:53
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ef38e88cf
commit
b84073f524
2 changed files with 23 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ as *propositional forms*.
|
|||
DeMorgan's Laws tell us how to distribute logical connectives across
|
||||
parentheses.
|
||||
|
||||
#theorem[DeMorgan's Laws][
|
||||
#fact[DeMorgan's Laws][
|
||||
+ $not (P or Q) = not P and not Q$
|
||||
+ $not (P and Q) = not P or not Q$
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
@ -104,4 +104,15 @@ parentheses.
|
|||
Trivially, by completing a truth table.
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
Also, propositional forms obey commutative, associative, distributive laws,
|
||||
which can be trivially obtained from symbolic manipulations and will not be
|
||||
restated. Together with the double negation law and the _law of the excluded
|
||||
middle_, these comprise the axioms of a system of propositional logic.
|
||||
|
||||
#fact[
|
||||
We abbreviate propositional forms by eliding parentheses, according to the rules:
|
||||
|
||||
+ $not$ is applied to the smallest proposition following it.
|
||||
+ $and$ connects the smallest propositions surrounding it.
|
||||
+ $or$ connects the smallest propositions surrounding it.
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -91,11 +91,11 @@ the previous ones.
|
|||
Check your intuition that this makes sense. Why do you think $RR^n$ was chosen
|
||||
as the notation for $n$ dimensional spaces in $RR$?
|
||||
|
||||
#remark[Disjoint sets][
|
||||
#definition[Disjoint sets][
|
||||
If $A sect B$ = $emptyset$, then we say that $A$ and $B$ are *disjoint*.
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
#fact[Properties of set operations][
|
||||
#fact[
|
||||
For any sets $A$ and $B$, we have DeMorgan's Laws:
|
||||
+ $(A union B)' = A' sect B'$
|
||||
+ $(A sect B)' = A' union B'$
|
||||
|
@ -148,3 +148,12 @@ When a set is uncountably infinite, its cardinality is greater than $aleph_0$.
|
|||
every set with cardinality $aleph_0$ has a bijection to $ZZ$. More generally,
|
||||
any sets with the same cardinality have a bijection between them.
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
This gives us the following equivalent statement:
|
||||
|
||||
#fact[
|
||||
Two sets have the same cardinality if and only if there exists a bijective
|
||||
function between them. In symbols,
|
||||
|
||||
$ N(A) = N(B) <==> exists F : A <-> B $
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue