From c708ab504f55b27306115706df971f8551ee9c0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Youwen Wu Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 23:31:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fix: delete mistakenly released blog post --- .../2024-10-31-a-retrospective-on-nixos.md | 197 ------------------ 1 file changed, 197 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 src/posts/2024-10-31-a-retrospective-on-nixos.md diff --git a/src/posts/2024-10-31-a-retrospective-on-nixos.md b/src/posts/2024-10-31-a-retrospective-on-nixos.md deleted file mode 100644 index f032fb5..0000000 --- a/src/posts/2024-10-31-a-retrospective-on-nixos.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,197 +0,0 @@ ---- -author: "Youwen Wu" -authorTwitter: "@youwen" -desc: "and the future of operating systems" -image: "./images/gradient-ascent.jpg" -keywords: "nix, nixos, functional programming, linux, unix" -lang: "en" -title: "a retrospective on NixOS" -updated: "2024-05-25T12:00:00Z" ---- - -Many people more knowledgeable than me have already written at length about the -virtues of NixOS and _declarative configuration_ and _immutability_ and such. I -doubt what I have to say is particularly novel to those already familiar with -Nix, but I'd like to discuss precisely what brings people to NixOS in the first -place. - -Many people will introduce NixOS by first introducing the Nix package manager, -and immediately jumping into terms like _derivation_ and _immutability_ and -_reproducibility_ and whatnot. And while these are important concepts for -understanding the system at large, it's not very convincing for people looking -to try out the system. After all, most people don't (or at least shouldn't!) -choose their tools based on hype or purported benefits, but based the problems -that they help them solve. - -Instead of immediately evangelizing about the virtues of Nix and NixOS, I'll -first motivate the reasons for why I chose a tool with exactly its properties -(but not to worry, the evangelizing will come later). - -Essentially: allow me to introduce you to the -origins of the [NixOS God -Complex](https://www.reddit.com/r/NixOS/comments/kauf1m/dealing_with_post_nixflake_god_complex/). - ---- - -My goals for my system are as follows: - -- Allow my computing environment to exist on different computers at the same - time (essentially, sync up configurations between machines) -- Precisely control the software and services on my machine. I should be able - to obtain binaries of most things to save time, but be able to step into the - source and apply patches or configuration as desired -- For the OS to be absolutely unbreakable -- Never configure the system twice; once I solve a problem, I should have a - reproducible solution that solves it permanently -- Be able to backup my system configuration and quickly redeploy it whenever - needed -- Avoid janky solutions to these problems that introduce tech debt. I don't - want to have to rely on disk images or backups, I want to be able to create - fresh installations quickly - -Essentially, I want to synchronize the configuration of my entire system across -multiple machines while maintaining a stable and usable system I'm not worried -will inadvertently fall apart with a routine system update. When I tweak and -mess with some settings on my desktop, I should be able to push to a `git` -repository and pull it down on my laptop and have the tweaks carried over. This -even includes system-level configuration like the applications installed, -system daemons, and other core system services. - -I want a source and binary based distribution simultaneously. And I want a -self-documenting reproducible system where every tiny tweak is -deterministically applied. And I want to be able to install my configurations -onto a new computer, from scratch, in an installer, effectively creating my own -custom Linux distribution. - -Oh, and I also want to solve the "works on my machine" problem, and never have -trouble using software someone else packaged and claims works on their end, but -fails on my computer. - -All or even just a few of these goals seem unattainable to the typical Linux -user (not to mention those still on Windows and macOS $\dots$ _oh, the -horror!_). But I was in fact able to achieve all of them. - ---- - -To begin, let's examine how one might try to approach these problems with the -common solutions. - -Let's talk about sharing configuration among multiple computers first, which -can be thought of as some form of "settings sync". - -Most people have encountered solutions to sychronizing configuration in two -ways: either the entire service is ran in the cloud, so it's really the _same_ -environment accessed from multiple places (eg. Google Docs), or it's some often -half baked opaque solution involving you making an account and sending all your -settings to a sync server (eg. Mozilla Firefox). - -The more technically minded may instead opt to create a "dotfiles" repository, -holding their vast collection of meticulously crafted configuration files. -These repos often come with a janky `install.sh` script that does its best to -install all the files into the correct place. This usually works the first -time, but trying to keep the installed dotfiles in sync with a central -repository is a whole other problem. - -There are also dotfile manager like `chezmoi` or GNU Stow. I have not tried -these so I make no judgements on their utility for their intended purpose. -These dotfile management solutions may work well for managing configuration -files, but they both have the same issue: you also need to install the software -you're configuring! - -The software and the configuration are fundamentally tied together; these are -not concerns to be separated. If the software is installed, it almost always -needs to be configured anyways. If the configuration exists, the software -should be installed. So a sane solution needs to both put the configuration in -the right place, _and_ set up the system's programs along with all their -dependencies! - -So, the most obsessive *nix hackers reach for tools like -[Ansible](https://www.ansible.com/), that promise automatic configuration of -entire systems. Though Ansible was initially designed to deploy cloud servers -quickly through the Infrastructure-as-Code approach, some people opt to use it -for deploying and managing their systems quickly as well. I have not personally -tried it beyond playing with a few examples The consensus seems to be that it -seems to work fine for simple use cases but gets quite unwieldy for more -complex purposes (especially for personal systems, which aren't expected to be -as ephemeral as servers). - -A system like Ansible combined with a system to manage configuration files -might be able to achieve a few of our goals. We can keep configuration in sync -between computers and we can quickly redeploy our system. But anyone who has -tried this will tell you that it's incredibly uncomfortable to use; our -existing operating systems are simply not designed to be managed in this -manner. Inevitably you will experience desynchronization between the -configuration and the actual state of the machine. - -Also, this does not solve some of our other problems. We'll still need tools -like Docker to reproducibly build software and figure out a way to keep our -system stable. - -If you agree with the premises I've laid out up to this point, that none of -these solutions provide a satisfying solution to our computing woes, you might -come to the conclusion that I've made. We need a solution that does _all of -it_. A unified tool for reliably deploying software and managing your system -configuration. And it must necessarily be declarative and reproducible, because -that is the only sane way to manage a system. Imagine working on a programming -project where recompiling with the same source code would non-deterministically -produce different results based on the environment! We should be able to write -files that declaratively and precisely specify the state of whole system, and -then be able to revert these files or tweak them with deterministic results -that don't leave behind any broken programs or files. - -Well, [Nix](https://nixos.org/) is the _purely functional_ package manager -(i.e. declarative, reproducible), and NixOS is a Linux distribution that is -managed entirely by Nix. Essentially, Nix provides a solution to the problem of -_software deployment_, and in fact was purpose built to do so in Eelco -Dolstra's seminal [PhD -thesis](https://edolstra.github.io/pubs/phd-thesis.pdf). It effectively solves -the problem of "works on my machine" by _forcing_ the user to actually specify -all required dependencies. This makes it a little harder to write the initial -build configurations due to the strictness imposed. But the reward is that if a -piece of software builds on one machine, it's guaranteed to build on another. - -NixOS is a system that takes the power of Nix and applies it to declaratively -configure an _entire Linux system_. All of the installed software and activated -services can be specified precisely using the Nix expression language, a purely -functional DSL used by Nix. And alongside the software, it also configures it, -effectively acting as a dotfile manager. Indeed, many core NixOS services and a -wide range of programs can be set up through _NixOS modules_, where the program -is installed and configured in the same place. (and many programs like `fzf`, -`btop`, etc have similar corresponding `home-manager` modules). - -NixOS is also _immutable_, which means that the system cannot be modified after -it is built from the Nix files that declare it. How do you make changes to the -system then? Obviously, we just create a new system where the changed programs -and files are included, and the old ones are removed. But they are not deleted -from the hard drive, they still exist in the _Nix store_. So, the system can -provide precise atomic rollbacks between each "generation" of itself. Broke -your GRUB configuration so your system won't boot? Messed up your kernel -settings? Just select an older working generation from the boot menu and you -instantly have a working system again. You never worry about breaking things -during either routine or massive system updates. - -And because the system is fully declarative, and modifying the system is done -only through modifying its Nix configuration files, you can version and sync -them up with Git. This solves the problem of keeping system environments in -sync; now, you truly only have to keep one repository of all your configuration -in sync, and all the software installation and deployment is handled for you by -a system designed precisely for that purpose. - -This makes it possible for me to share common configuration between a multitude -of entirely distinct machines, including an `x86_64` desktop, an `x86_64` -laptop, an Apple Silicon Macbook running NixOS `aarch64` using [Asahi -Linux](https://asahilinux.org/), and the same Macbook running macOS with -`nix-darwin`, sharing `home-manager` configuration with NixOS. Specific -configuration necessary to adjust hardware-specific details between each -machines are isolated to the [hosts](./hosts) directory. - -This works exceptionally well, evidenced by the fact that I have (almost) the -exact same environment across three separate machines, spanning two entirely -distinct CPU architectures. - -In essence, the primary failure of deployment scripts, Ansible and the like is -that they are _imperative_ - they must specify precisely _how_ to set up the -system, down to minute details, whereas in a _declarative_ approach, the user -can simply specify what the system _should look like_, and abstractions take -care of the _how_. This is what NixOS does, and it gives you remote syncing, -versioning (via `git`), and rollbacks _for free_.