implements liminalOS, a NixOS-based Linux® distribution
Find a file
2024-10-31 01:01:47 -07:00
hosts chore: add new fastfetch configuration to callisto 2024-10-29 23:30:20 -07:00
lib refactor: pointless abstraction for fun 2024-10-25 14:44:25 -07:00
modules fix: use new name for noto-fonts-cjk 2024-10-22 23:15:37 -07:00
overlays chore: remove commented out lines 2024-09-14 00:04:33 -07:00
users/youwen feat: add zathura 2024-10-30 11:40:05 -07:00
.envrc feat: add devshell and direnv 2024-10-29 22:11:27 -07:00
.gitignore feat: add devshell and direnv 2024-10-29 22:11:27 -07:00
.prettierrc.toml docs(readme): formatting and some more content 2024-08-11 15:05:42 -07:00
flake.lock flake.lock: Update 2024-10-29 23:06:11 -07:00
flake.nix chore: use new lix module 2024-10-31 01:01:47 -07:00
LICENSE feat: successfully compile on callisto (asahi aarch64) 2024-08-07 05:57:55 -07:00
README.md Update README.md 2024-10-30 01:26:54 -07:00
TODOS.md docs: update some stuff 2024-08-24 03:23:36 -07:00

liminalOS

This is a repository that implements liminalOS, my personal Linux distribution based on NixOS.

Time wasted writing Nix code: + wakatime

These are essentially just my NixOS configuration files. I use flakes, home-manager, agenix, all the buzzwords. But it sounds cool to have your own OS! (and NixOS is essentially a purpose-built language and ecosystem to allow you to build your own immutable operating system anyways.)

Many have written at length about the virtues of NixOS and declarative configuration and immutability and such. I doubt what I have to say is particularly novel, but I'll leave a few thoughts about Nix and NixOS and why they do things better anyways. In particular, instead of immediately evangelizing about the virtues of Nix, I'll first motivate the reasons for why I chose a tool with exactly its properties, based on my use case (but not to worry, the evangelizing will come later).

Essentially: allow me to introduce you to the origins of NixOS God Complex.

If you would like advice on whether or not to use NixOS:

see hlissner's breakdown, reproduced below: Should I use NixOS?

Short answer: no.

Long answer: no really. Don't.

Long long answer: I'm not kidding. Don't.

Unsigned long long answer: Alright alright. Here's why not:

Its learning curve is steep. You will trial and error your way to enlightenment, if you survive the frustration long enough. NixOS is unlike other Linux distros. Your issues will be unique and difficult to google. A decent grasp of Linux and your chosen services is a must, if only to distinguish Nix(OS) issues from Linux (or upstream) issues -- as well as to debug them or report them to the correct authority (and coherently). If words like "declarative", "generational", and "immutable" don't put your sexuality in jeopardy, you're considering NixOS for the wrong reasons. The overhead of managing a NixOS config will rarely pay for itself with 3 systems or fewer (perhaps another distro with nix on top would suit you better?). Official documentation for Nix(OS) is vast, but shallow. Unofficial resources and example configs are sparse and tend toward too simple or too complex (and most are outdated). Case in point: this repo. The Nix language is obtuse and its toolchain is not intuitive. Your experience will be infinitely worse if functional languages are alien to you, however, learning Nix is a must to do even a fraction of what makes NixOS worth the trouble. If you need somebody else to tell you whether or not you need NixOS, you don't need NixOS.


lim·i·nal

  1. between or belonging to two different places, states, etc.

The goal of liminalOS is to allow my computing environment to exist in different computers at the same time, and to be absolutely unbreakable while doing so. Let's talk about existing in multiple computers first, or otherwise known as some form of "settings sync". To the typical user, stuck in the imperative world, this sounds unrealistic at worst, and janky at best. Generally, people encounter environment or settings syncing in two ways: either the entire service is ran in the cloud, so it's really the same environment accessed from multiple places, or it's some often half baked opaque solution involving you making an account and sending all your settings to a sync server (see: Mozilla Firefox).

The more technically minded may instead opt to create a "dotfiles" repository, holding their vast corpus of meticulously crafted configuration files. These repos often come with a janky install.sh that does its best to throw all the files into the correct place. This usually works the first time, but trying to keep the installed dotfiles in sync with a central repository is a whole other problem.

But these solutions are generally used for singular services or applications. Keeping an entire system synced up across computers down to the minute configurations and applications seems incredibly unwieldy, through our usual conception of how we interact with our operating systems.

The more obsessive system tweakers might try a dotfile manager like chezmoi or GNU Stow. I have not tried these so I make no judgements on their utility for their intended purpose, but generally these solutions miss a key feature: they provide the configuration, but don't install the software. But the software and the configuration are fundamentally tied together; these are not concerns to be separated. If the software is installed, it almost always needs to be configured anyways. If the configuration exists, the software should be installed. These solutions may work well for managing configuration, but they have the same issue as before: you also need to install the software you're configuring!

So, *nix hackers reach for things like Ansible, that promise automatic configuration of entire systems. Though Ansible was designed to deploy cloud servers quickly through the Infrastructure-as-Code approach, some people opt to use it for deploying their systems quickly as well. I have not tried it, but from what I've heard, it works fine for simple deployment but gets quite unwieldy for more complex purposes (especially for personal systems, which aren't expected to be as ephemeral as servers).

If you agree with the premises I've laid out up to this point, you might come to the conclusion that I've made: to solve this issue, we need a solution that does all of it. A unified tool for deploying software and managing systems. And it must necessarily be declarative and reproducible, because that is the only way to sanely manage a system. Imagine working on a programming project where recompiling with the same source code would non-deterministically produce different results based on the environment!

Well, Nix is the purely functional package manager (i.e. declarative, reproducible), and NixOS is a Linux distribution that is managed entirely by Nix. Essentially, Nix provides a solution to the problem of software deployment, and in fact was purpose built to do so in Eelco Dolstra's seminal PhD thesis. NixOS is a system that takes the power of Nix and applies it to declaratively configure an entire Linux system. All of the software can be specified precisely using the Nix expression language, a purely functional DSL used by Nix. And alongside the software, it also configures it, effectively acting as a dotfile manager. Indeed, many core NixOS services and a wide range of programs can be set up through NixOS modules, where the program is installed and configured in the same place. (and many programs like fzf, btop, etc have similar corresponding home-manager modules).

NixOS is also immutable, which means that the system cannot be modified after it is built from the Nix files that declare it. How do you make changes to the system then? Obviously, we just create a new system where the changed programs and files are included, and the old ones are removed. But they are not deleted from the hard drive, they still exist in the Nix store. So, the system can provide precise atomic rollbacks between each "generation" of itself. Broke your GRUB configuration so your system won't boot? Messed up your kernel settings? Just select an older working generation from the boot menu and you instantly have a working system again. You never worry about breaking things during either routine or massive system updates.

And because the system is fully declarative, and modifying the system is done only through modifying its Nix configuration files, you can version and sync them up with Git. This solves the problem of keeping system environments in sync; now, you truly only have to keep one repository of all your configuration in sync, and all the software installation and deployment is handled for you by a system designed precisely for that purpose.

This makes it possible for me to share common configuration between a multitude of entirely distinct machines, including an x86_64 desktop, an x86_64 laptop, an Apple Silicon Macbook running NixOS aarch64 using Asahi Linux, and the same Macbook running macOS with nix-darwin, sharing home-manager configuration with NixOS. Specific configuration necessary to adjust hardware-specific details between each machines are isolated to the hosts directory.

This works exceptionally well, evidenced by the fact that I have (almost) the exact same environment across three separate machines, spanning two entirely distinct CPU architectures.

In essence, the primary failure of deployment scripts, Ansible and the like is that they are imperative - they must specify precisely how to set up the system, down to minute details, whereas in a declarative approach, the user can simply specify what the system should look like, and abstractions take care of the how. This is what NixOS does, and it gives you remote syncing, versioning (via git), and rollbacks for free.

Installation guide

TBD. May use deploy-rs or the in-house dartgun tool for easy deployment.

FAQ

This looks like a collection of NixOS configuration files and modules. What makes it a distinct distribution?

Most Linux1 users will agree that any self-respecting distribution must include at least the following: installer, package manager, and some set of default packages. Therefore, anything that implements the aforementioned items must also be a Linux distribution.

liminalOS comes with the Nix package manager (nobody said you need a unique package manager - Ubuntu and Debian are distinct distributions yet both use apt), a custom desktop environment comprised of Waybar, Hyprland, rofi, as well as various applications installed by default, and the means to generate an installer. Therefore, liminalOS is a Linux distribution. QED.2

Should I actually install this?

No. You should instead use the modules as configuration examples if you need them as they are heavily customized for my needs, which are not the same as yours.

Hosts

The modules in liminalOS are designed to be utilized by a wide variety of machine configurations, including via nix-darwin on macOS. To that end, modules are organized by operating system (darwin vs. linux), architecture (x86_64 vs. aarch-64), and form factor (desktop vs laptop). Anything that is agnostic of these distinctions is considered a "common module" and allows configuration to be shared between the various host types. This generally includes core programs like CLI tools, the window manager, etc.

The flake.nix currently contains my configuration for four hosts:

Hostname Description
"callisto" a Macbook Pro M1 (2021) running under Asahi Linux. Imports the laptop module sets as well as the core NixOS module sets.
"demeter" a custom desktop with an i7-13700KF and RTX 4080. Imports the desktop module, the core NixOS modules, and additionally the gaming module.
"phobos" Macbook Pro M1 (2021) running macOS with nix-darwin. Imports the core home-manager module as well as some darwin-specific modules for window managers and the like.
"adrastea" Razer Blade 14 (2021) with RTX 3070. Imports the laptop module, the core NixOS modules, and the gaming module.

Keybinds

Non-exhaustive.

Shortcut Action
Super + W Toggle floating
Super + K Toggle layout
Super + E Open Dolphin
Super + T Open kitty
Super + F Open librewolf
Super + R Open pavucontrol
Super + Space Open rofi
Super + Backspace Open logout menu
Super + L Screenshot region
Super + HJKL Move around
Super + Ctrl + HL Move workspaces
Super + Alt + Ctrl + HJKL Move windows around workspaces
Super + Shift + Ctrl + HJKL Move windows around
Super + S Open Special Workspace
Super + Enter Fullscreen Window
Super + Alt + S Move Window to Special Workspace

  1. also known as GNU/Linux, GNU+Linux, Freedesktop/systemd/musl/busybox Linux, Linux+friends, etc ↩︎

  2. although this is not actually how the converse works, the rigor-hungry mathematicians reading can cry about it. ↩︎